PLEASE READ!!!

***** ALL users will have to request a password reset BEFORE you will be able to log into the forum. See the thread in the forum issues section for further instructions. If you have issues with this, email us at admin@urbanohio.com. Also, check your spam folder. *****

We are still having a lot of users try to log on before resetting your password. You will continue to get an error until you reset your password!!

Author Topic: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)  (Read 2192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online surfohio

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 6684
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #150 on: May 06, 2010, 09:00:59 AM »
I'm really sad to hear about Rock Bottom.

My friends and I have had a lot of fun there over the years.

Well it looks like the Rock Bottom is closing after all, and Improv moving to the Shooters building, just to expand Windows on the River?  Is it really that profitable?  Was Howel at the Moon already gone?

"To make room for the expansion, Windows has bought out the lease of Cyrus Waterfront Caf and the assets of Rock Bottom Brewery.

"Closing Rock Bottom allows us to focus our energies on the Cleveland Chop House in the Warehouse district........
Other plans for the entertainment complex include moving the Cleveland IMPROV comedy club to a larger space next to Shooter's on the Water. The expanded facility will include a patio on the Cuyahoga River and an upper level VIP room."
 http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2010/05/windows_on_the_river_to_expand.html


Offline jborger

  • One World Trade Center 1,776'
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #151 on: May 06, 2010, 11:49:41 AM »
I thought construction on the aquarium was supposed to start this year and effectively push out Windows on the River and everything else there?  But spending $1 million to expand Windows on the River seems silly if they're going to kick them out soon. 

The article says, "These improvements are in addition to plans for a $50 million development adjacent to the Powrhouse in which an aquarium will be the focal point." 

Adjacent?  Not "inside"?  So where exactly is the aquarium going and when does construction start?

In regards to Windows not being used...  They have a lot of business luncheons there during the week.  I've been to a couple of events there and a couple of weddings.  They obviously ARE busy enough if they're expanding.  I mean, this is a private business, not the government.  :)

Rock Bottom was usually dead when I went by.  I wish it wasn't because I love the space and the restaurant.  But there just isn't enough on the West Bank to draw people there.  We need major mixed use development on those surface parking lots.

Yeah, yeah, I know...  Down economy, market forces, blah, blah blah...

Offline jborger

  • One World Trade Center 1,776'
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #152 on: May 06, 2010, 12:05:45 PM »
There's something happening at the building at West St. Clair and Old River Road -- the old "Calabria Fine Italian Foods" building.  The windows have been papered over for a while, I've heard hammering going on over there...  Anyone know anything?


Offline Hootenany

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #153 on: May 06, 2010, 01:07:43 PM »
^They were rebuilding the deck behind the building.  That's been going on for about a week... maybe two now.  They should be pretty much done.  I have no idea what is happening inside though.

Offline peabody99

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #154 on: June 23, 2010, 03:05:19 PM »
another blow to the West Flats:

"Spaces gallery in Cleveland wants out of the landlord business and plans to sell its building at Superior Viaduct

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Owning its own building since 1990 has given Spaces, the city's nonprofit, artist-run gallery, a sense of independence and financial stability. 

Now, however, Spaces sees its three-story brick loft building at 2220 Superior Viaduct as a distraction from its core mission. Christopher Lynn, who joined Spaces as its third director just under two years ago, said today the organization will soon list the three-story brick loft building for sale for $595,000....." 
http://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2010/06/spaces_gallery_in_cleveland_wa.html

Offline jborger

  • One World Trade Center 1,776'
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #155 on: June 28, 2010, 07:59:12 PM »
I don't think it's necessarily a "blow".  They're not tearing the building down, it's just changing owners.  Spaces doesn't plan on vacating their space right away.  And when they do, they'll go somewhere else.  As the article said, the area has changed due to new construction (Stonebridge).  And I think that new construction is for the better.

Online KJP

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 45320
  • Rebuilding the cities that built America.
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #156 on: June 28, 2010, 08:54:35 PM »
How is it a blow? And is Spaces even moving?
America will never be destroyed from the outside. -- Abraham Lincoln.

Offline StapHanger

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #157 on: June 29, 2010, 06:15:59 PM »
Great news here!

Grants from Cleveland Foundation and Peter Lewis boost plans for Rivergate Park in Cleveland

http://blog.cleveland.com/architecture/2010/06/grants_from_cleveland_foundati.html

Philanthropist Peter B. Lewis announced he was giving a $250,000 dollar-for-dollar matching grant to the rowing project, while the Cleveland Foundation approved a $300,000 grant.

Adams said that after the two grants announced Tuesday, the rowing foundation has $700,000 left to raise. [out of $3.2M purchase price]

Offline StapHanger

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #158 on: July 01, 2010, 04:04:31 PM »
And more money for the Cleveland Rowing Foundation's proposed Rivergate Park!

Rivergate Park project receives $200,000 from George Gund Foundation, bringing the week's total donations to $750,000

http://blog.cleveland.com/architecture/2010/07/rivergate_park_project_receive.html

Adams said the Gund grant brings the Rivergate project to within $700,000 of the $3.2 million price for the property. Rivergate advocates have a purchase option that expires July 31.


Hmmm, the last article announcing the two previous grants also said $700,000 left to raise.  Not sure if that one was premature or if they forgot to lower the number this time...

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #159 on: July 01, 2010, 04:09:42 PM »
Hell yeah!  I'm thinking the PBL gift inspired this one as well...
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 04:10:15 PM by MuRrAy HiLL »

Offline StapHanger

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #160 on: July 01, 2010, 04:21:37 PM »
So which UO wants to cough up the last $700k?

Offline 3231

  • Global Moderator
  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 6451
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #161 on: July 01, 2010, 09:42:40 PM »
Hell yeah!  I'm thinking the PBL gift inspired this one as well...

That's not how it works. Applications were due long ago. The board comes in and approves what the staff has recommended. The foundations are very deliberate in the process. Whether PBL gave money or not, I bet it didn't influence either of the two foundations. Additionally, these foundations give a lot of "guidance" to their applicants.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 09:43:32 PM by 3231 »

Offline Whipjacka

  • Burj Khalifa 2,722'
  • *****
  • Posts: 1085
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #162 on: July 01, 2010, 09:43:42 PM »
I would, but i am currently spending 700K on receiving a college education :/

Offline Hootenany

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #163 on: July 02, 2010, 07:43:47 AM »
I would, but i am currently spending 700K on receiving a college education :/

 :-o  You're getting taken for a ride..  :-D

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #164 on: July 02, 2010, 08:47:30 AM »
Are there any green card seeking foreigners.....one would do the trick if it could create 10 jobs...:D

Offline shs96

  • Burj Khalifa 2,722'
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #165 on: July 16, 2010, 11:27:49 AM »
FYI - Swing Bridge closing Monday (7/19) for a year for repairs:

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/07/center_street_swing_bridge_in.html

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #166 on: July 16, 2010, 11:47:36 AM »
This is good news and, especially with so many other bridges getting improvements, but I'll never understand why this sh!t takes a year+.  If this was in any other country, I bet it would be done within at least three months.  I'm guessing it's contract related to maximize worker and company pay. Maybe this is my inner world-traveler speaking...when I was in Doha for a few months, all I saw were crains and construction, and building shooting up in the course of a month or two. I know, different labor and different pay and workers on site 18-24 hrs a day, but still...

Offline w28th

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 2210
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #167 on: July 16, 2010, 12:26:17 PM »
You must have never been to Italy...

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #168 on: July 16, 2010, 12:41:06 PM »
You must have never been to Italy...

LOL...

You're right.

But I am going to France and Spain next week.  I'll make sure to take note of Spains recent construction, instead of comparing Cleveland to Doha.

Offline ccars

  • Kettering Tower 408'
  • **
  • Posts: 203
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #169 on: July 16, 2010, 12:41:21 PM »
^^ Qatar has very lax building regulations and unions are few and far between if they are even legal. In Cleveland and other muncipalities, any government project is inherently burdened by a tangled web of cronyism, kickbacks, preferred union shops, deliberate budget overruns and all-out materials theft. There's no incentive whatsoever to complete the project quickly and efficiently.

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #170 on: August 24, 2010, 05:58:21 PM »
More money coming in...we're getting closer:

Grants from Lennon and Lozick foundations lift hopes for Rivergate project on the Cuyahoga
Published: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 6:20 PM     
 Steven Litt, The Plain Dealer


New grants from the Fred A. Lennon Charitable Trust and the Lozick Foundation have pushed the Cleveland Rowing Foundation $100,000 closer this year to the dream of establishing a public center for rowing, canoeing and kayaking on the Cuyahoga River. The foundation is negotiating a bridge loan with a bank to complete the $3 million deal to buy the former Commodore's Club Marina on Columbus Road peninsula in the Flats. A closing is planned for mid-September.

"We're confident we're going to get there," said Jon Adams, co-chairman of the Rivergate Fund. "In the last month we've just seen tremendous and widespread support for the project. "People are actually starting to get it. They see the potential for bringing thousands of people down to the river by opening up the river to public use. It's resonating."

http://blog.cleveland.com/architecture/2010/08/grants_from_lennon_and_lozick.html

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #171 on: September 13, 2010, 08:41:50 PM »
Awesomeness...

Creating Rivergate Park: Cleveland Rowing Foundation buys site on Cuyahoga River
Published: Monday, September 13, 2010, 8:55 PM     
 Steven Litt, The Plain Dealer

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- The Cleveland Rowing Foundation closed a deal Monday to create Rivergate Park, a new public park on the Cuyahoga River devoted to rowing, canoeing, kayaking and dragon-boating.

The foundation raised $3 million in grants, donations and loans in less than a year to purchase nearly seven acres on Columbus Road Peninsula from the former Commodore's Club, a powerboat marina and boat storage center at 1785 Merwin Ave. The park is expected to open next summer.

http://blog.cleveland.com/architecture/2010/09/rivergate.html
« Last Edit: September 13, 2010, 08:42:35 PM by MuRrAy HiLL »

Offline Triumph36

  • Dirt Lot 0'
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #172 on: September 13, 2010, 09:24:35 PM »
Wonderful news :-)

Offline shs96

  • Burj Khalifa 2,722'
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #173 on: September 14, 2010, 09:09:01 AM »
Pretty exciting.  I wonder if all of this activity/development in the flats will prompt the city to re-pave the roads, put in some curbs/sidewalks, remove concrete barriers & chain link fences, pick up litter, etc.  A facelift alone would make a big difference.

Offline MuRrAy HiLL

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #174 on: September 14, 2010, 09:16:20 AM »
^ With this all happening at once (FEB, Casino, Rivergate) I would hope so as well.  The roads down there are some of the worst in the city.

Let's just put some more population down there a.k.a property owners. :)

Offline RyanScav

  • Rhodes Tower 629'
  • ***
  • Posts: 446
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #175 on: September 14, 2010, 05:59:35 PM »
you know i have always imagined an urban community, maybe 5-10 storey highrises down there. just the right height so they are under the bridges. could be really incredible. add a few canals and you have one of the coolest urban neighborhoods in the entire U.S...

Offline Htsguy

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #176 on: September 14, 2010, 06:27:58 PM »
^^Roads...I bet the sewers are the worse in the city....any development would require lots of help from the city for infrastructure improvements.

Offline pcforsgren

  • Metropolitan Tower 224'
  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #177 on: October 11, 2010, 05:41:14 PM »
For those with Crain's subscriptions, there is an article this week on the Flats and some momentum going in there:

http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20101011/SUB1/310119992/1071/TOC&Profile=1071

and a free podcast with some dicussion for those who don't have a sub:

http://e.ccialerts.com/a/hBMs2UGAJFIzoAJaUOuAYYiDvxX/ccl94-1

Offline pcforsgren

  • Metropolitan Tower 224'
  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #178 on: October 11, 2010, 05:56:30 PM »
Interesting article (I just read it) - they even tease (again) Scranton Road Peninsula and Forest City wanting to connect it to the casino. Other then that it discusses the towpath, some businesses moving in, and a short mention of the East Banks project, which it says is still stalled.

The most interesting quote is "Forest City didn't pay $2 million for this property in the 1980s to use it as a parking lot". 
Cmoooon mixed use riverfront development  :-D
« Last Edit: October 11, 2010, 05:57:22 PM by pcforsgren »

Offline Hts121

  • Jeddah Tower 3,281'
  • *****
  • Posts: 18146
Re: Cleveland: Flats Developments (Non-Stonebridge or FEB)
« Reply #179 on: October 11, 2010, 06:06:00 PM »
Thanks pcforsgren.  You might not have noticed that we now have a thread dedicated to flats development (non-FEB).