^ As a Conservative with an advanced degree, it was pretty clear that we became "anti-intellectual" because certain facts hurt our platform. Climate data, et al. have now thrust scientists into politics in a way not seen since the Scopes Monkey Trials or Galileo - both of which situations proved science to be the more reliable.
I'm also a conservative with an advanced degree, but I come down on the opposite side of the climate science issue. The evidence of the extreme politicization of that field is too strong. Suppression of contrary findings, deliberate defunding and blacklisting from publication of research even intended to seek contrary findings, deletion of e-mails to avoid public records requests, inexplicable corruption of raw data, methodology deliberately designed to hide inconvenient data points or "normalize" them out of existence, etc. Again, though, this is far afield from Moore. I very much doubt that any significant amount of the support
or opposition to him is motivated by his likely defense of Scott Pruitt at the EPA (defense which I'm just assuming based on his other positions and haven't even investigated for one acarpous second).