Remove ads

Author Topic: The Bike Subculture Thread  (Read 3331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline E Rocc

  • 1450'-Willis Tower
  • *********
  • Posts: 1837
  • Defender Of The Sprawl.
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #35 on: August 11, 2012, 04:13:06 AM »
This whole, cyclists being held to a higher standard than motorists is motorist propaganda pure and simple and I can't say I'm surprised to see it more prevalent in Ohio (though I used to complain about lawbreaking cyclists too here and there, until it dawned on me both are equally lawbreakers).

unfortunately in New York cyclists never seem to be held up to any standard (as bad as some motorists can be--especially taxis--at least for the most part they follow the rules). I constantly observe cyclists breezing through red lights totally oblivious to any pedestrians or motorists who have the right of way--I guess it's just way too uncool for them to actually follow the law. It's outrageous. The level of arrogance they display is unbelievable. I don't know what it's going to take for law enforcement authorities to finally start cracking down on this sort of behavior, but it has to stop, or cyclists will only start to become more marginalized and despised--and deservedly so.


To this I respond that motorists have killed 241 pedestrians and cyclists total in NYC last year (note that this figure does not include motorists killed). And I follow up that statement with a simple question. How many people did cyclists kill last year in comparison? This link for this year says it all as far as how well-behavd motorists are: http://www.streetsblog.org/2012/08/03/nypd-7371-pedestrians-and-cyclists-injured-79-killed-through-june-2012/ . Motorists should be more marginalized and despised--and deservedly so.

So when I see cyclists blowing through red lights like in that video, yes of course it's dumb and I'd advise against it, but I just shrug it off and couldn't care less. Looking at the bigger picture it's just nothing to get riled up about.


From the article:

"In fact, the automobile industry lobbied to make jaywalking a crime in the twenties, leaving current traffic rules "like a brawl," according to one expert, "where the strongest brawler wins."

It's not a crime to jaywalk in NYC?  That would explain a lot.  So would the described behavior of bicyclists. 

If one of the guys in the above video had gotten t-boned by a semi, he'd be one of those "statistics".   How many of those 241 were themselves at fault?  Just because physics was not on your side doesn't mean the law should be.


« Last Edit: August 11, 2012, 04:13:58 AM by E Rocc »
When you practice your crime
On the taxpayers' dime
That's Dimora.....

Offline jeremyck01

  • 468'-Scripps Center
  • ***
  • Posts: 294
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #36 on: August 12, 2012, 03:52:51 PM »
This whole, cyclists being held to a higher standard than motorists is motorist propaganda pure and simple and I can't say I'm surprised to see it more prevalent in Ohio (though I used to complain about lawbreaking cyclists too here and there, until it dawned on me both are equally lawbreakers).

unfortunately in New York cyclists never seem to be held up to any standard (as bad as some motorists can be--especially taxis--at least for the most part they follow the rules). I constantly observe cyclists breezing through red lights totally oblivious to any pedestrians or motorists who have the right of way--I guess it's just way too uncool for them to actually follow the law. It's outrageous. The level of arrogance they display is unbelievable. I don't know what it's going to take for law enforcement authorities to finally start cracking down on this sort of behavior, but it has to stop, or cyclists will only start to become more marginalized and despised--and deservedly so.


To this I respond that motorists have killed 241 pedestrians and cyclists total in NYC last year (note that this figure does not include motorists killed). And I follow up that statement with a simple question. How many people did cyclists kill last year in comparison? This link for this year says it all as far as how well-behavd motorists are: http://www.streetsblog.org/2012/08/03/nypd-7371-pedestrians-and-cyclists-injured-79-killed-through-june-2012/ . Motorists should be more marginalized and despised--and deservedly so.

So when I see cyclists blowing through red lights like in that video, yes of course it's dumb and I'd advise against it, but I just shrug it off and couldn't care less. Looking at the bigger picture it's just nothing to get riled up about.


You're right.  When those cyclists blow the red light and they get plowed into by a car that had the green light, and therefore right-of-way, that's nothing to get riled up about.  Just another death to add to your count.  No big deal. :roll:

Offline E Rocc

  • 1450'-Willis Tower
  • *********
  • Posts: 1837
  • Defender Of The Sprawl.
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #37 on: August 13, 2012, 10:59:26 PM »
At the Broadway Forbes I-271 interchange, there's a light where the traffic crosses Forbes to continue onto the entrance ramp.   

5:45 this morning (already a heavy traffic time).   Bicyclist on Forbes riding on the left side of the road crosses the intersection on the "orange".  No lights or even side reflectives on the bike, dark clothing on the rider.

Just damn.....
When you practice your crime
On the taxpayers' dime
That's Dimora.....

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #38 on: August 13, 2012, 11:15:27 PM »
...thats  reminder that I need to get some reflective tape on my bike and a night light for the front now the days are getting shorter and I might be riding at dusk.

Re jaywalking.   Growing up in Chicago this is something you learn...how to jaywalk.  Not that its illegal but how do it without getting creamed.   My grandfather was the one who was my jaywalking mentor.   EVERYONE jaywalks in Chicago....at least the natives....

Cycling though is a lot riskier.  During my last Chicago trip it was just wow...so many people out cycling...on fairly narrow busy streets like the diagonals..Lincoln and Milwaukee....cycling in a city already as congested and trafficy as Chicago is really too much for me....and I saw guided bike tours!  I'm sorry, no.  Just stop. 


Offline natininja

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4286
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #39 on: August 14, 2012, 12:04:13 AM »
Think of how much congestion would be alleviated if everyone in the loop in a 90+ square foot car were on a bicycle instead.

Online bfwissel

  • 555'-LeVeque Tower
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
    • My Cincinnati Life
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #40 on: August 14, 2012, 12:53:05 AM »
I'm sure I'm going to get flamed for this, but it must be said.  The vast majority of cyclists: 1) do not know the laws regarding cycling, or 2) know the laws, but don't care to follow even the most basic of them.  For the first time in over a week I finally saw someone following the laws by riding in the street, with traffic, and stopping at a red light.  The rest of the week I saw dozens of cyclists riding on the sidewalk, riding against traffic (one fool almost got hit) and blowing through red lights.  To top it off, a coworker of mine came in yesterday furious about his bike commute convinced that "all mankind is doomed".  Apparently, the idiots walking on the sidewalk across a bridge were taking up the "entire sidewalk" when he was trying to ride past them.  To be fair my experiences are limited mostly to downtown Cincinnati, but if all the supportive comments on the fools racing through traffic is any indication, there is no shortage of selfish/ignorant cyclists.  It's not fair that those that do follow the law get accosted by angry drivers/pedestrians.  However, given that most people's experiences with cyclists are with those that selfishly endanger themselves and others, it really isn't too surprising that people lump them together with the majority.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 01:48:45 AM by bfwissel »
"Someone's sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago." - Warren Buffett

Online JohnClevesSymmes

  • 468'-Scripps Center
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Excess ain't rebellion
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #41 on: August 14, 2012, 01:24:48 AM »
^That could have been a legit move depending on the bridge

Offline smith

  • formerly CorySnyder
  • 629'-Rhodes State Tower
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
    • circa1979
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #42 on: August 14, 2012, 01:36:44 AM »
OK - I admit it.  I don't wait for red lights.  I slow down and if there is no cross traffic, I go.  When walking, I also cross the street outside of crosswalks and even at crosswalks when the light is red.

Offline Sherman Cahal

  • Premium Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6857
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #43 on: August 14, 2012, 02:15:32 AM »
Ditto. It's stupid to waste so much momentum to stop at every traffic light if there is no cross traffic - like many of Cincinnati's side streets with traffic signals. Just my two cents:

I don't wait at most traffic signals on lesser traveled routes to maintain momentum and speed. On some routes, like Mitchell Ave., I'll wait but watch the cross traffic signals (and pattern) and go through the intersection as their signal turns from yellow to red to get ahead of traffic, which enhances my visibility.

When biking, I use the right tire path to center of the roadway to enhance my visibility and to claim my lane. It forces traffic to pass me by occupying another lane and prevents motorists from doing the "squeeze" - you know, giving me a feet or so.

Generally, if you are respectful of motorists, they will be respectful of you. There are exceptions, though. I had some banker hotshot (wearing pinstripe slacks and a pink collared shirt) cut me off on the Ludlow viaduct, so I rattled on his windows to yell at him at a traffic signal. He proceeded to call the police and I waited for them. While the cop sided with me - noting that 90% of the cases that he sees are the motorists just being ignorant and stupid, there isn't anything that they can do unless an injury occurs. But if you (and others) call in a car with the plates frequently enough, the police apparently do take notice and can send an officer out. Something I did not know.

Offline jmecklenborg

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4661
    • http://www.cincinnati-transit.net
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #44 on: August 14, 2012, 03:11:07 AM »
>With every bike organization, I've felt this vibe of arrogance. 

Not every but most.  Bicycling is pretty damn simple, pretty much as simple as walking or running.  I'm not sure what practical purpose all this social commotion surrounding it of late could possibly serve.  Generally the older guys that have been biking since the 70s like the guys at Queen City Bike are low-key about it.  The younger internet generation people are the ones for whom photos from bicycling group rides are taken to show-off on their Facebook pages.   

I grew up in a terrible area for bike riding but started going on 10+ mile rides on a dirt bike around age 11 or 12.  I biked many times as a kid along the horrible part of Colerain Ave. and the huge hills on the west side of Cincinnati like Race Rd. and Rybolt Rd.  So all this city riding stuff is no big deal to me. 

If someone wants to bike for real transportation, they need to ride by themselves on streets, because that's what they will be doing.  Bike trails are fine but you will never be truly "free" until you start riding on busy streets. 

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #45 on: August 14, 2012, 03:57:34 AM »

Quote
OK - I admit it.  I don't wait for red lights.  I slow down and if there is no cross traffic, I go.

I'm that way with four-way stops, but the traffic has to be light...I gear down and look...and glide through if no traffic.   I >might< blow past a red light on an empty street on Sunday morning....but I would feel odd doing it.  When Im riding on the street my 'car mode'b or psychology kicks in and I follow the lights....


Quote
If someone wants to bike for real transportation, they need to ride by themselves on streets, because that's what they will be doing.

As I mentioned down here (or up here if yr from Cincy) in Washington Twp/Centerville they encourage cyclists to use the sidewalks on busy streets/highways, which I do.  But if the traffic is lighter I'll ride in the street, near the curb but not in the gutter. 

For crossing I usually get on the sidewalk at the intersection prior to the one I turn at, and 'go ped' for that one block and the crossing....easy to do since the curb cuts here have those depressed ramps with rubber strips on them....(yr not jumping curbs).

Bike trails are, for me, for "Sunday Drives'...only really usefull for recreation and testing endurance...seeing how far I can go (last Sunday it was a round trip to Xenia).



 

 

Offline jmecklenborg

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4661
    • http://www.cincinnati-transit.net
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #46 on: August 14, 2012, 04:34:50 AM »
I agree that the paved bike trails in our area can get monotonous.  There's really not a whole lot to look at on the ride from Cincinnati to Columbus, and I've biked the whole thing. Also, I hate being stranded out there when a thunderstorm hits.  If they had little shelters placed every mile or two it wouldn't be so bad.

Intercity riding on the state routes gives you more to look at and places to duck when a storm hits and places to get water and food.  I've done Cincinnati to Columbus in one day twice on the trail and Xenia is the obvious lunch stop, but there is no healthy food there that I've seen. 

Online eastvillagedon

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2134
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #47 on: August 14, 2012, 04:43:00 AM »
I'm sure I'm going to get flamed for this, but it must be said.  The vast majority of cyclists: 1) do not know the laws regarding cycling, or 2) know the laws, but don't care to follow even the most basic of them.  For the first time in over a week I finally saw someone following the laws by riding in the street, with traffic, and stopping at a red light.  The rest of the week I saw dozens of cyclists riding on the sidewalk, riding against traffic (one fool almost got hit) and blowing through red lights.  To top it off, a coworker of mine came in yesterday furious about his bike commute convinced that "all mankind is doomed".  Apparently, the idiots walking on the sidewalk across a bridge were taking up the "entire sidewalk" when he was trying to ride past them.  To be fair my experiences are limited mostly to downtown Cincinnati, but if all the supportive comments on the fools racing through traffic is any indication, there is no shortage of selfish/ignorant cyclists.  It's not fair that those that do follow the law get accosted by angry drivers/pedestrians.  However, given that most people's experiences with cyclists are with those that selfishly endanger themselves and others, it really isn't too surprising that people lump them together with the majority.

I just witnessed a young woman get yelled at by an angry cyclist as she was standing in a bike lane--obviously in his way-- looking north on Broadway. Wow, I
guess she really deserved that!--oh, wait a minute, the cyclist was going in the wrong direction (to quote Gomer Pyle, USMC, "surprise, surprise, surprise!")--not anticipating that some a-hole would come barreling up against her from behind!! It must be nice to follow your own rules of the road  :-)
« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 06:38:52 AM by eastvillagedon »

Online ryanlammi

  • 629'-Rhodes State Tower
  • *****
  • Posts: 697
  • Wololoo
    • Flickr Profile
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #48 on: August 14, 2012, 04:50:55 AM »
In terms of commuting:

Car Drivers:  :whip:
Bike Riders:  :x
Walkers:  :-)
"We both would have looked silly if he came in, got out and came back in.”

- Tim Burke, Hamilton County Democratic Party Chairman

Twitter

Flickr Profile

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #49 on: August 14, 2012, 11:42:56 PM »
Quote
Bicycling is pretty damn simple, pretty much as simple as walking or running.  I'm not sure what practical purpose all this social commotion surrounding it of late could possibly serve.

It's a fad.  There is sort of this ideological "green' thing going on, but also a lot of hipsterish styling, too.  Taken together its become a trendy thing.  Like "lofts" and urban farming and indy coffeeshops and "craft beer". 

Thinking back I'm trying to recall what started that big bike boom back in the 1970s.   


 

Offline OTR

  • 665'-Queen City Square
  • ******
  • Posts: 889
  • Over-the-Rhine
    • OTR Blog
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #50 on: August 15, 2012, 11:59:33 AM »
Quote
Bicycling is pretty damn simple, pretty much as simple as walking or running.  I'm not sure what practical purpose all this social commotion surrounding it of late could possibly serve.

It's a fad.  There is sort of this ideological "green' thing going on, but also a lot of hipsterish styling, too.  Taken together its become a trendy thing.  Like "lofts" and urban farming and indy coffeeshops and "craft beer". 

Thinking back I'm trying to recall what started that big bike boom back in the 1970s.

The bike boom in the 70s might have been a result of the trifecta of anti-establishment hippie culture, the oil crisis, and (i'm not sure on this) the greater availability of cheaper bikes (imports and such). There was also a general youth culture that blossomed with the birth of the teenager.

Certainly the bike culture today is part fad but I think there is a semblance of permanence to it - sprawlville and driving isn't as attractive as it used to be. Urban living is more popular with all age groups - from baby boomers to young adults - the ease, affordability and proliferation (of the idea) of bike infrastructure also makes it a real transit choice that it hasn't been for a long time.

So - part fad, part reality. I'm not drawn to biking because it's environmentally friendly, hipsterish, or provides a social community --- I just like to ride and dislike driving/parking.

Offline natininja

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4286
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #51 on: August 16, 2012, 12:06:58 AM »
I hope biking as a status symbol dies soon, but I think its functionality, combined with investments in and proliferation of urban lifestyles (including bike infrastructure) will make cycling even more popular. To the extent I am a bike advocate, my goal is to make cycling like driving or breathing, just a natural thing for people of all stripes to do in a utilitarian fashion. Much as it is in many parts of Europe.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 12:09:14 AM by natininja »

Offline surfohio

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2558
    • Out of Place: a portrait of surfing in Cleveland, Ohio
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #52 on: August 16, 2012, 01:51:36 AM »
For me on the bike, the safest way to ride is by operating in a sort of "grey area" by following some traffic laws, and while violating others.

I recently rode through CLE with my buddy Paul, who is an accomplished cyclist both on and off road. I was really uncomfortable because Paul follows EVERY traffic law by the book. In my opinion, this "acting like a car" is of course following the rules, but it places you, as a cyclist, in far more danger than is necessary.

I'm not going to excuse cyclists doing stupid things, but to place cars and bikes on an equal, level playing field is just not right. It is NOT a level playing field and you are at far more risk of being killed.

Online JohnClevesSymmes

  • 468'-Scripps Center
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Excess ain't rebellion
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #53 on: August 16, 2012, 02:01:10 AM »
Quote
In my opinion, this "acting like a car" is of course following the rules, but it places you, as a cyclist, in far more danger than is necessary.

This is absolutely true. For example, if you are biking on a multi-lane one way street and need to take a left. The law states that you need to keep to the right - which means you will have to cross several lanes of traffic before you can take the left. On a bike, one cannot simply "change lanes" like a car.  You might have to weave through a line of cars stopped at a light, or you might have to run a red light in order to safely change lanes with no cars moving behind you.  There is a way to do it safely, especially in downtown grid-type situations.

Offline E Rocc

  • 1450'-Willis Tower
  • *********
  • Posts: 1837
  • Defender Of The Sprawl.
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #54 on: August 16, 2012, 02:37:58 AM »
Quote
In my opinion, this "acting like a car" is of course following the rules, but it places you, as a cyclist, in far more danger than is necessary.

This is absolutely true. For example, if you are biking on a multi-lane one way street and need to take a left. The law states that you need to keep to the right - which means you will have to cross several lanes of traffic before you can take the left. On a bike, one cannot simply "change lanes" like a car.  You might have to weave through a line of cars stopped at a light, or you might have to run a red light in order to safely change lanes with no cars moving behind you.  There is a way to do it safely, especially in downtown grid-type situations.

The safest way might be to walk it across the crosswalks as if you were a pedestrian crossing diagonally. 

One thing I've been noticing lately is that in areas where there is a lot of car traffic and almost no pedestrian traffic, bicyclists use the sidewalk (example:  Richmond Road between 271 and Miles.   Technically illegal, but sensible.
When you practice your crime
On the taxpayers' dime
That's Dimora.....

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #55 on: August 16, 2012, 03:28:18 AM »
Quote
The safest way might be to walk it across the crosswalks as if you were a pedestrian crossing diagonally.

....yeah, thats what I do.  Wait for the walk/dont walk sign and then ride across vs walking it...using the crosswalk and sidewalk....


Quote
One thing I've been noticing lately is that in areas where there is a lot of car traffic and almost no pedestrian traffic, bicyclists use the sidewalk (example:  Richmond Road between 271 and Miles.   Technically illegal, but sensible.

..yeah, this is the common sense approach.  That's how I see it.  Dont know that stretch you ref in Cleveland, but here in Dayton suburbia, this is how people do it, too.   The pedestrians one sees are mostly joggers/fitness walkers.   Riding on the sidewalk in, say, downtown areas or busy neighborhood retail strips like youd see in Chicago is pretty dangeerous, though....




 
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 03:44:36 AM by Jeffery »

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #56 on: August 16, 2012, 03:42:31 AM »

Quote
The bike boom in the 70s might have been a result of the trifecta of anti-establishment hippie culture, the oil crisis, and (i'm not sure on this) the greater availability of cheaper bikes (imports and such). There was also a general youth culture that blossomed with the birth of the teenager.

I think the oil crisis & the interest in "ecology" might have had something to do with it, but the availability of imports came before that...by just a bit....

I recall my dad buying this Japanese import bike, with hand brakes and a five speed grip shifter, from Korvettes (this was in Chicago) back in 1970 or so....this bike was more a Euro-style utility bike with fenders and a back rack, vs the racing/road bikes that became popular later during the 1970s,   

It reminded me a bit of my German aunts bike...i recall she used that as basic transportation but her bike had this little generator that ran the front light.   This type of basic transportation/utility bike bike wasn't what caught on in the US back then, though... but it makes me wonder if this Japanese bike was something the Japanese would use to get around their towns...

But it was in the 1970s that you really started to see those road/racing bikes with the 'drop' handlbars, lever shifters, and 10 speeds or more, which used to be pretty exotic in the US before then.  I guess kids would 'trade up" from banana seat chopper bikes to these speedier bikes as they got older....

I remember that it wasn't so much bike commuting but more a recreational thing.  But they did start building bike paths back then, too (including an early one in Louisville)... 

Offline surfohio

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2558
    • Out of Place: a portrait of surfing in Cleveland, Ohio
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #57 on: August 16, 2012, 03:59:45 AM »
My inspiration getting into cycling.


Offline Rusty Shackleford

  • 574'-Carew Tower
  • ****
  • Posts: 425
  • The Cincinnati/Dayton Metroplex (of sorts)
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #58 on: August 17, 2012, 02:23:14 PM »
^ Er, "Breaking Away"?

Offline David

  • Premium Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6369
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #59 on: August 18, 2012, 11:36:00 AM »
Penalty for Rule-Breaking Bicyclists: A Remedial Class
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/nyregion/manhattan-court-sends-erring-cyclists-to-remedial-class.html

Quote
It comes amid broad agreement among bike advocates and the Transportation Department that compelling riders to obey traffic signals, go with traffic and stay off the sidewalk is critical to improving the image of cycling and ensuring the long-term health of New York City’s expanding bicycle network.

...

Mr. McKissick was hardly alone in complaining of unfair treatment at a class last week. Several cyclists admitted riding on the sidewalk for a few feet and complained that the sentence — often a day of community service in addition to the class — was excessive.

“It was literally three seconds,” Steve Galiczynski said of his short sidewalk ride to his parking spot on the Upper West Side, witnessed by a police officer. He said he had already spent a day cleaning up trash in Times Square. “This whole thing is nuts. It’s like I’m in a Russian novel — a crazy Russian novel.”

...

If there is one thing that unites New Yorkers who see bikes as a menace with others who view them as a mainstream form of urban transportation, it is a mutual disdain for the lawbreaking cyclist.



Obey traffic laws, eh? Too bad police don't lead by example. Just the other day, I was biking down High St. behind 4 cops patrolling, also on bike. I was curious to find out how they ride. What etiquette they adhere to and what signals they use. They were swerving through different lanes, one did a U-turn then hopped onto a sidewalk and none of them used signaling when stopping or turning.
Modern architects recognize 300 masterpieces but ignore the other 30 million buildings that have ruined the world. - Andres Duany

Offline jmecklenborg

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4661
    • http://www.cincinnati-transit.net
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #60 on: August 27, 2012, 09:09:21 AM »

Offline surfohio

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2558
    • Out of Place: a portrait of surfing in Cleveland, Ohio
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #61 on: August 27, 2012, 09:39:06 AM »
^ Er, "Breaking Away"?


Yep! American Flyers was pretty fun also. It's written by Steve Tesich, who did the screenplay for Breaking Away.

If you don't know that's pre-stardom Kevin Costner on the left:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Flyers
« Last Edit: August 27, 2012, 09:39:46 AM by surfohio »

Offline Jeffery

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 2468
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #62 on: August 28, 2012, 08:12:14 AM »

Quote
If you don't know that's pre-stardom Kevin Costner on the left


...I recognized the face but couldnt place it.

@@@@

Here is another take on the bike subculture thing...from Milwaukee (of all places) comes this nice, large format slick quarterly...has a sort of zine-ish feel, like Urban Velo.

Cog 

...but they cover BMX and cyclocross type of stuff too...




 

Offline GCrites80s

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 3187
  • Running Free
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #63 on: August 28, 2012, 11:20:26 AM »
The other thing about subcultures and trends within these interest groups is that a lot of it is driven by marketing. Growing up with BMX in the '80s, I really dug the brightly colored bikes and gear of the last half of the '80s. BMX racing doesn't really change that much, but freestyle changes at the drop of a hat. The '80s stuff was all about people smiling and having fun impressing the neighbors. The riders did their thing to stuff like Iron Maiden, synthpop and Van Halen. In 1991, all of a sudden the bikes were all either black or chrome, everybody was listening to Faith No More and the Beastie Boys, the videos were all fisheye lenses and people acting like goofballs (putting on animal suits and running into walls, so not quite Jackass level or anything). I didn't get it, so I tuned out freestyle. I had a hard time learning tricks anyway. But there's no way that things can change overnight like that without assistance from the business community.

Over on the motorcycle side, the subcultures are just as notorious. Everybody knows about Harley guys, Ruff Ryders sportbikers and the Goldwing crowd. But, there's also plenty of others including the 2-stroke streetbike crowd (known for their smoky exhausts, heroic marijuana consumption and being from California) and the cafe racer crowd (long gas tanks, super stripped-down bikes, small engines, flat paint). Largely, you'd think they have a lot in common because the bikes are somewhat similar. A guy over at the 2-stroke forum converted his '70s Yamaha RD350 over to cafe racer style, which is a somewhat popular and easy thing to do. But of course, he goes to the cafe racer meet and guys get cranky because he's not on a Norton and isn't wearing an ancient pudding bowl helmet and glass goggles as portrayed in the old advertising and on the Cafe Racer TV show that's on now.

Offline jmecklenborg

  • 2717'-Burj Khalifa
  • **********
  • Posts: 4661
    • http://www.cincinnati-transit.net
Re: The Bike Subculture Thread
« Reply #64 on: August 28, 2012, 01:42:58 PM »
Yeah, all those fads in the 80's were hard to deal with.  It was one stupid thing after another.  It showed the extent to which most people value not originality but being early identifier of style trends.  So when people complain about school uniforms not allowing kids to "express themselves", what they actually mean is not being able to attract social capital by being an early adopter of frivolous fads. 

Meanwhile, the counter-culture cliques can be as bad if not worse than the rest.  People can dedicate many years of their youth to these things and walk away with absolutely nothing.  The worst is what you describe above where one must commit their entire lives to being a "real" member of such a clique.  It's a big problem in music when people wall themselves off from everything other than a handful of musicians.