0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I wonder about these people. I just read a short but good article in Northern Ohio Live (the story is not available online anywhere) that mentioned that they charge you $10 to hear a pitch idea. If you ask anyone in the creative business, this is not a good or ethical business practice. They claim it's to "weed out" nutjobs. What, nutjobs don't have $10? That is not a credible argument. If they want to have a fundraiser, then have one. But making people pay to pitch is not an acceptable practice in this industry. It's like when someone wants you to pay to audition with them. It's just not done.
I will re-state my opinion though that the $10 to pitch an idea is not very ethical.
Thanks jpop, that's a good explanation. I will re-state my opinion though that the $10 to pitch an idea is not very ethical.
Quote from: rockandroller on May 06, 2009, 08:05:30 AMThanks jpop, that's a good explanation. I will re-state my opinion though that the $10 to pitch an idea is not very ethical.Another thing is that, the casting website that they featured in one of their articles in connection with Nehst (I think it was in the PD at some point) actually charges a fee for you to submit yourself in consideration for one of their roles. They don't charge you to put up your headshot and resume, and they don't charge you to search through casting notices, but they charge you a fee to submit your materials in consideration for a role.
Yes, there are lots of predators out there in the creative world just like any other business. I *know* the norm, and I can 100% guarantee you this is NOT an acceptable practice in the real entertainment industry, you do not pay to audition.
I know what you're talking about MTS. Certain large casting agencies (like central casting in LA) keep their own digital files and you have to pay them because they take your pic and keep it on file and there is a fee associated with that. But first off, that's CENTRAL CASTING IN LA, and that's not what we're talking about here. Obviously if you go get headshots done you pay for those but you pay a photographer, not an agent. And paying for your pix doesn't mean you get control of them by the way, lots of photogs will either not let you have the rights to the pix (or in old school terms, the negatives) or they will charge you an additional fee to have them going forward. This is not what we're talking about. We're talking about people who AREN'T EVEN CASTING FOR A PARTICULAR FILM who want you to pay a fee to audition. It is just not done.
This has nothing to do with film or processing, though. This just has to do with submitting ideas/a headshot and resume. There is no film or processing involved in that.
We're talking about people who AREN'T EVEN CASTING FOR A PARTICULAR FILM who want you to pay a fee to audition. It is just not done.
Quote from: rockandroller on May 06, 2009, 12:43:29 PMWe're talking about people who AREN'T EVEN CASTING FOR A PARTICULAR FILM who want you to pay a fee to audition. It is just not done.No, according to their audition website, they charge you a fee when you want to submit your headshot and resume to be considered for a particular role that is available. You specify which role you'd like to audition for, pay a small fee (it's like $3.95 for each submission), then you get to submit your materials in regards to a specific role that is available for casting on their website. There are already some projects listed on there that they're casting for.
Quote from: jpop on May 06, 2009, 12:42:01 PMThis has nothing to do with film or processing, though. This just has to do with submitting ideas/a headshot and resume. There is no film or processing involved in that.EXACTLY.
Quote from: jpop on May 06, 2009, 01:05:05 PMQuote from: rockandroller on May 06, 2009, 12:43:29 PMWe're talking about people who AREN'T EVEN CASTING FOR A PARTICULAR FILM who want you to pay a fee to audition. It is just not done.No, according to their audition website, they charge you a fee when you want to submit your headshot and resume to be considered for a particular role that is available. You specify which role you'd like to audition for, pay a small fee (it's like $3.95 for each submission), then you get to submit your materials in regards to a specific role that is available for casting on their website. There are already some projects listed on there that they're casting for.Well just to play devil's advocate for a moment, could they really have some sort of unsavory business model based on $3.95 a submission? I mean, if it was $10 as discussed before that's one thing, but $3.95? It seems like maaayybbbee a legit argument could be made for "administrative costs" or something. I understand that having a fee at all is not in line with industry norms, but at $3.95, could it maybe be just an innocent (but poorly advised) choice to cover the cost of doing business?
^lets give them the benefit of the doubt. Maybe they are using a small fee to weed out people who are not serious about their idea.