CincyInDC and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: John Schneider on August 06, 2012, 07:46:48 AMSo the City of Cincinnati has a $36 million wasting asset producing less than $40,000 in gross income per year which it has agreed to sell to Blue Ash. It has accepted $6 of the million price upfront.Unwilling to accept the twice-expressed will of Cincinnati voters, COAST goes to another jurisdiction and tries to interfere with the contract that would liberate that stranded $36 million asset for other municipal purposes including $11 million for the streetcar. The effect of COAST's action here, if it were to be successful, would be to lock up the $36 million in the Cincinnati airport system for the exclusive of a bunch of affluent private pilots and corporations. Which further affirms my belief that COAST has no core principles and just acts opportunistically on whatever tactics present at the moment.With all due respect to your knowledge of the inner workings of the streetcar and the esteem which I hold for you on that subject, I wish you'd stop tossing around the $40,000 figure to somehow illustrate the value of Blue Ash Airport. As I said up thread, the income the city receives from the airport is only a small part of the value of the airport to the local economy. In 2006, Wilbur Smith Associates - an independent consulting firm that has produced more economic impact studies of airports than any other firm in the country - published a report stating that Blue Ash Airport is responsible for 75 jobs producing in excess of $7m in economic output.Your point in response was that little of that impact accrues to the city of Cincinnati, and that's probably true. But those jobs are local and the majority of that output stays in the metro area. Those on-airport businesses also pay income and property taxes, and the employees pay income tax, and their sales generate sales tax. These are locally-owned businesses employing local workers.By your logic, no municipality should ever build the road networks within an industrial park because those roads don't directly generate income to the municipality, and in fact cost money to maintain. You can't forget about the businesses that locate along those roads, though, which is what you seem to do with the businesses on Blue Ash Airport.Please don't try to portray the airport as strictly a $40,000 per year concern. The people that work on the airport and its allied businesses deserve better.
So the City of Cincinnati has a $36 million wasting asset producing less than $40,000 in gross income per year which it has agreed to sell to Blue Ash. It has accepted $6 of the million price upfront.Unwilling to accept the twice-expressed will of Cincinnati voters, COAST goes to another jurisdiction and tries to interfere with the contract that would liberate that stranded $36 million asset for other municipal purposes including $11 million for the streetcar. The effect of COAST's action here, if it were to be successful, would be to lock up the $36 million in the Cincinnati airport system for the exclusive of a bunch of affluent private pilots and corporations. Which further affirms my belief that COAST has no core principles and just acts opportunistically on whatever tactics present at the moment.
I don't know anything about these people, but what's posted in that bulletin makes a ton of sense and I would bet it is the way the council members see the issue.On the bright side, this is probably the most attention and excitement anyone on Blue Ash city council has seen since they've been in office.
After Blue Ash Vote enabling Streetcar Thur, COAST turns attention to Duke Energy Rate increase to fund Boondoggle. Yep, yet another tax
Also, the tax base of the City of Blue Ash is so small, despite having many office complexes....
Just comparing some numbers, b/c I wanted to know...Blue ash income tax revenue was 30 million in 2011 (Compared to Cincy's 298 million in 2010); Income tax revenue is about $2000 per capita for Blue Ash (15,000 pop?) and just over $1000 per capital for Cincy (297,000 pop)
It is interesting to note just how much both cities get from their respective income taxes. It makes up 35% of Cincinnati's revenues, and 63% of Blue Ash's. Property taxes in both cities contribute only single-digit percentages.
That is income of residents, not income of those who work in the city. DT Cincinnati and Uptown are still the region's #1 and #2 employment centers with Blue Ash #4, from what I remember. Also, Cincinnati has huge sources of industrial property tax income that aren't going away like the CSX/Norfolk-Southern railroad yards.
There was some new in studio guest on 550 this morning who was pumped full of COAST data who was presented as a grassroots "concerned citizen", not unlike Jeff Cappel.
Quote from: jmecklenborg on August 08, 2012, 02:53:44 AMThere was some new in studio guest on 550 this morning who was pumped full of COAST data who was presented as a grassroots "concerned citizen", not unlike Jeff Cappel.That was Scott Meyer, a Deerfield Township pilot and a member of Save the Blue Ash Airport Committee. And he finds the streetcar "offensive."Love how Brian Thomas kept saying how Scott is just a guy, a concerned citizen, the power of one! And neither one of them once mentioned that only $11M of the $37M goes to the streetcar.
It should be noted that almost none of these pilots will be moving to Lunken.Lunken is almost entirely full. There are almost no available hangars and no room for any businesses or other pilot schools to move to (there already is a pilot school). So everyone should accept that these jobs/pilots are going to Butler or Clermont County airports. I don't think there's anything wrong with that as the benefit of selling & shutting down the airport is worth it to the City of Cincinnati, but the idea that most of these jobs/pilots/revenue will move to Lunken isn't true, only a little if any of it will.
I love peeking in and to see what you guys are discussing in this thread. Maybe about 50% it is actually something directly about the street car. This has got to be urban ohio's number one off topic thread. Just saying.
Quote from: Htsguy on August 08, 2012, 01:17:29 PMI love peeking in and to see what you guys are discussing in this thread. Maybe about 50% it is actually something directly about the street car. This has got to be urban ohio's number one off topic thread. Just saying. Opponents of the streetcar are frequently criticized for tying anything & everything to the streetcar, the proponents here seem equally adept.
Quote from: Quimbob on August 08, 2012, 11:31:44 PMQuote from: Htsguy on August 08, 2012, 01:17:29 PMI love peeking in and to see what you guys are discussing in this thread. Maybe about 50% it is actually something directly about the street car. This has got to be urban ohio's number one off topic thread. Just saying. Opponents of the streetcar are frequently criticized for tying anything & everything to the streetcar, the proponents here seem equally adept.UO'ers, particularly in the Cincinnati threads, are obsessive about determining what is on-topic and what is not. I agree that threads get off-track. Anytime people are communicating freely, there's an opportunity to veer. I also notice that relevant tangents are proclaimed off-topic fairly often. Instead of commenting on others being off-topic, I would just contribute info I deem relevant if I desire the thread to return to a strict, linear focus.